Weighing in on an issue that is drawing attention nationwide, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently held, in Socko v. Mid-Atlantic Systems of CPA, Inc., that the mere continuation of employment is not sufficient consideration to support a restrictive covenant. Rather, for there to be sufficient consideration, the Court held that the employee must receive “some corresponding benefit or a favorable change in employment status.” As examples of such sufficient additional consideration, the Court cited “a promotion, a change from part-time to full-time employment, or ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Epstein Becker Green Files Amicus Brief for 10 National Industry Organizations to Uphold District Court’s Order Setting Aside the FTC Noncompete Ban
- Trade Secrets Litigation: 2025 Update
- The Buckeye State to End Employer Noncompetes? Ohio Introduces Bill That Would Ban Employers from Entering into Noncompetes
- Washington State Seeks to Broaden the Definition of “Noncompetition” and Ban Most Noncompetes
- Preparing for Non-Compete Litigation: 2025 Update